After reading “How to Read Like a Writer” and “Introduction
to Primary Research,” I feel I’ve gained a better understanding on how to read more
effectively, and how to use research and reading in ways to better my own writing.
An example that helped me understand the important relationship between reading
and writing (in terms of using reading to better writing) was in the “How to
Read Like a Writer” excerpt where Bunn explained that when you RLW, instead of
reading for knowledge on the topic of whatever you’re reading, you’re trying to
get knowledge and an understanding about the ‘writerly techniques’ used by the
writer. The text itself—along with the decisions made by the writer that made
the piece what it is—are what we’re not only reading, but trying to understand.
I still find it kind of confusing, but this week’s readings
helped me get a better understanding of the concept. I definitely do understand
the benefits of being able to read like a writer, and I understand how that can
easily translate to becoming a better writer overall. Also, it helped me to
realize that reading like a writer also means thinking about decisions I would
make had it been me writing the piece. Also, knowing the context of the writing
and what it’s about helps to gain a better understanding of some of the choices
the writer makes.
Driscoll’s excerpt was very informative as well, but I would
have to say I got more out of the Bunn’s. The information about sources and about
how to effectively conduct surveys and interviews were great to read about
before our actual interviews take place!
No comments:
Post a Comment